San Bernardino: Another False Flag after 9/11

Posted by on Dec 9th, 2015 and filed under FEATURED, Recent Posts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry


The lifeless body of Syed Farook, with his hands cuffed behind his back, is seen lying face down on the ground next to a large pool of blood. Was he shot dead after hand cuffed?

The lifeless body of Syed Farook, with his hands cuffed behind his back, is seen lying face down on the ground next to a large pool of blood. Was he shot dead after hand cuffed?

AS SOON as news emerged of San Bernardino mass shooting that resulted in the killing of 14 and wounded 21.Due to the fact that the shooter couple names were from Pakistani origin, quick questions came to mind;

1. This was the 353rd mass shootings of 2015 in USA. The questions arises that why is only the San Bernardino shooting in particular was immediately figured out to be a terrorist act and FBI announced to take charge of the investigation considering it a terrorist act?

2. The picture that was shown to the media was a dead body lying face down in a pool of blood. He was handcuffed, again the question is why he was shot if he was already captured and handcuffed?

3. Why is this picture not showing the dead body of his wife, Tashfeen Malik with the alleged SUV if both were shot dead at the same time?

4. Syed Farook was born and raised in USA. There is no criminal charge or any indication of “radicalization” in his bio. His wife Tashfeen Malik was born in a Punjab village and studied in Pakistan, lived in Saudi Arabia where there are extremely strict laws. Saudi Arabia is partner of USA in countering terrorism. How can a woman, a non Arab Pakistani living in Saudi Arabia where she can’t even drive a car be radicalized?

5. The FBI director said that there was still “a lot of evidence that doesn’t quite make sense? How quickly it started making sense?

6. If Syed Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, a student of the Quran, were religious and adherent to Islam as evidence shows, how were they unaware that killing innocent people will lead them to hell and not in the heaven?
7. How can a “religious person” knowingly doom their everlasting life. In the hereafter death will be worst, how can they leave their six month child and commit this horrible crime?

Now, in an interview with CNN, Farook’s family attorney Chelsey has put forward many questions as well as revealed multiple interesting details that the mainstream media has so far refused to cover and demand answers to.

Attorney David S. Chelsey is first asked by CNN correspondent Chris Cuomo if the family can explain how Farook apparently went from someone they knew and loved to someone who could do something so monstrous.

“There’s a lot of disconnects, and there’s a lot of unknowns, and a lot of things that quite frankly don’t add up,” Chelsey replied.

Keep in mind that both investigators and witnesses have claimed that at least 2 gunman stormed the conference room with military precision before lighting up the entire room and killing at least 14 people. One expert even called the shooting a “professional murder.” Clearly the attackers were heavily trained which doesn’t seem to line up with the physical and mental characteristics of the shooter and his wife.

“She was never involved with shooting, she is probably about 90 pounds so it is unlikely she could even carry a weapon or wear some type of vest,” Chelsey continued.

Towards the end of the brief interview the attorney makes a previously unheard claim that, if true, brings the entire official narrative into question.

“Where the couple was found, from what I understand, is that they were handcuffed, lying face-down in this truck, shot up.”

Does this mean the accused terrorists were handcuffed after they were shot by police or is this attorney claiming that police shot them while they were cuffed or that they found them like that?

Writing for the Free Thought Project, William N. Grigg detailed even more oddities surrounding the attack and its aftermath.

According to CNN, the couple had left damaged cell phones in a trash bin on the scene. Citing unnamed “authorities,” the network said that this suggested that the couple “was trying to hide their tracks, and make it impossible for investigators to see what was on their cell phones.” Of course, this could have been done more easily by not bringing the incriminating cell phones with them, rather than discarding them at the scene of the massacre.

The hard drive on the couple’s computer is also missing, which has resulted in a subpoena to their Internet Service Provider. A dedicated member of a terror cell would try to destroy electronic information that could incriminate co-conspirators. According to defenders of the NSA’s all-encompassing electronic surveillance, Islamist radicals are being more careful to avoid leaving cyber-breadcrumbs that can be followed; merely removing a hard drive from a desktop computer wouldn’t be enough.

Alex Thomas, a reporter and opinion journalist in writes:

“Another oddity, according to CNN reports, is the composition of the explosives found in the couple’s home: The recipe followed in making the pipe bombs does not match any of the formulas associated with al-Qaeda, ISIS, or other known terrorist groups. So far the facts that have been revealed clearly do not point to the normal operating procedure of Islamic terrorists although that could have been done on purpose to throw authorities off.

“While we may never know the exact details, the claims made by Chelsey deserve further investigation at the very least. It’s obviously possible that he is just spewing BS to help his clients but one has to wonder what actually happened during that horrific day?”

Earlier the attorneys said they sat through four hours of questioning with Farook’s family members by the FBI and said nothing was found that showed the family knew of the attacks.

There was nothing linking this to religion or terrorist activity,’ Chesley said. ‘They’re the FBI and they’re damn good at receiving this information.’

Chesley claimed that the FBI kept Farook’s mother in custody until the rest of her children came in for questioning.
Both Attorneys Chesley and Abuershaid said they had seen the FBI’s evidence and are not convinced the pair were directly linked to foreign terror groups.

Instead they accused investigators, journalists and the public of jumping to assumptions because the couple was Muslim.
In a bizarre remark, Chesley said: ‘All there is thus far [to indicate terrorism] is this nebulous thing that somebody looked at something on Facebook.

‘I mean any one of us can look at something on Facebook, it doesn’t mean we believe in it. I’ve checked out a Britney Spears post, and I hate Britney Spears’ music.’

Chesley said: ‘When a Christian goes to shoot up a Planned Parenthood or an extreme Catholic goes and bombs an abortion clinic, all the headlines do not say “extremist radical Christian, Catholic, Christian, Catholic”… just like right now every headline is saying Muslim.

‘There is a tendency to take a cookie cutter version or paradigm of a terrorist type event and superimpose it on a situation just because that person is of Muslim belief or Muslim tradition.

‘I do not think we should jump to too many conclusions in particular because I think we need to protect the Muslim community.’

In fact, it is believed that Planned Parenthood shooting suspect Robert Lewis Dear, 57, was an evangelical Christian, rather than a Catholic.

Challenged over the remarks by journalists who pointed out that it was the FBI themselves who announced their investigation is linked to terrorism, Abuershaid hit back.

He said: ‘I think every investigation the FBI does when it’s involving a Muslim will involve some kind of terrorist investigation.’

The attorneys said the FBI will continue their investigation.

‘[Motive] has been very hidden. I guess we’re all wanting justice, and we’re all wanting to know anyone affiliated with [the attack]. We need to be protective and respectful of everyone’s freedom of religion,’ Chesley said.

Now check an eye witness account;

In a phone interview with CBS Abdelmageed explained:

“It looked like their skin color was white […] they appeared to be tall”, says an eyewitness.

“I heard shots fired and it was from you know an automatic weapon. […] very unusual. Why would we hear shots? As we looked out the window a second set of shots goes off […] and we saw a man fall to the floor. Then we just looked and we saw three men dressed in all black, military attire, with vests on they were holding assault rifles. As soon as they opened up the doors to building three […] one of them […] started to shoot into the room.”

When asked what the gunman that shot into the room looked like the eyewitness replied:

“I couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on […] black cargo pants, the kind with the big puffy pockets on the side […] long sleeve shirt […] gloves […huge assault riffle […] six magazines […] I just saw three dressed exactly the same”.

“You are certain you saw three men,” the newscaster asked Abdelmageed.
“Yes,” said Abdelmageed.

“It looked like their skin color was white. They look like they were athletic build and they appeared to be tall.”

In a shill-like manner the CBS reporter responded, “And of course we just learned that one suspect was a woman.”

Will the world able to know the facts what really happened at San Bernardino?

How long Muslims will be used as sacrificial lambs?

4 Responses for “San Bernardino: Another False Flag after 9/11”

  1. muhammad khan says:

    There were three attackers,I heard this on a radioshow in New York City also on 99.5FM. There is something called “psy war”,this was practiced in wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and now this seems to be tried in USA as well.God help and have mercy on USA and it’s inhabitants.

  2. Meer Sahib P.Eng. says:

    Re: “How can a woman, a non Arab Pakistani living in Saudi Arabia where she can’t even drive a car be radicalized?”
    Saudi Arabia is a closed society, and people from Pakistan are considered ‘3rd country nationals’ and hence RARELY invited for Saudi social gatherings. It’s very hard for a non-Saudi, non-Arab and non-Arabic speaking woman to be included in the Halaqa (religious discussion) sessions. Most often, the Saudi women talk about worldly matters – new dresses, perfumes, latest electronic gadgets… than “revolutionary” matters. Just because a person has lived there, it does not mean they have been radicalized.
    Probably when the psy-op ‘experts’ found out she had been in Saudi Arabia, she might have been considered a good target to be used as a patsy.

    Further, Farook have had occasional arguments with a Jewish fellow employee. This could have also made him a target for a patsy.

    Some things do not add up : no mother and father, especially if they are pious and God-fearing would ever leave a 6 month old baby a destitute; no Muslim with any understanding of Islamic teachings would kill INNOCENT people to make a point. It is murder, plain and simple and guaranteed to earn hell-fire. It also defies logic as to why a dead man would be handcuffed! Or, how a handcuffed person could go on a shooting spree. If it was in fact a psy-op, bomb-making materials and other incriminating items found at the Farook residence, should be of no surprise, as these can be easily planted there.

    IT IS OF PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE to the American public (much more than to the Muslim community) that the REAL culprits of these psy-ops are apprehended and brought to justice, as otherwise, such terror attacks will never end. The media’s collaboration and the politicians’ inclination to blame and incriminate Muslims have helped protect the culprits of the psy-ops.

  3. Tazz says:

    I just want to ask about the authenticity of this picture. I am closely following the news but have not noticed this pic. Do you have more pics?

Leave a Reply

Log in | Designed, Developed and Hosted by: BIZIBIZI INC.